@MarkSZaidEsq "Most damning evidence"=#CIA was warned by #Sterling lawyers (you & RK) that he *might* #leak to #presshttp://www.salon.com/2015/01/28/this_is_how_a_police_state_protects_secrets_jeffrey_sterling_the_cia_and_up_to_80_years_on_circumstantial_evidence/ …
@MarkSZaidEsq That's your explanation. Not Hunt's, so not what jury heard. @JesselynRadack @BradMossEsq
-
-
@emptywheel@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq I would have testified. Not my call. I don't second guess my colleagues who know more than you -
@MarkSZaidEsq I have said to those who have asked that 1) Hunt was desperate 2) obv can't be true.@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq -
@emptywheel@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq Did you write that in your article? -
@MarkSZaidEsq No. Bc article was abt what jury heard. No one said, "if this were true, Olshan would call Zaid"@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.