@MarkSZaidEsq "Most damning evidence"=#CIA was warned by #Sterling lawyers (you & RK) that he *might* #leak to #presshttp://www.salon.com/2015/01/28/this_is_how_a_police_state_protects_secrets_jeffrey_sterling_the_cia_and_up_to_80_years_on_circumstantial_evidence/ …
@MarkSZaidEsq So your claims is ONLY thing that ties Sterling to press is not damning? @JesselynRadack @BradMossEsq
-
-
@emptywheel@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq How on the world can you even say it's the only tie? And, no, not most damning. -
@MarkSZaidEsq Because I actually attended the trial, which you didn't? Because it was?@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq -
@emptywheel@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq You think bc you sat through testimony that makes you an expert on law or natsec? -
@MarkSZaidEsq Sorry. Where did I say that? I didn't. You're straw manning again, as usual.@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq -
@emptywheel@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq Let's be specific then. Who knows more about this case? Me or you? -
@MarkSZaidEsq What that story is abt is what jury heard, not more damning evidence jury didn't hear.@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq -
@emptywheel@MarkSZaidEsq@JesselynRadack Damning according to who? Did any juror say that? -
@BradMossEsq Sorry. I'm working off basic logic. I know that's not your strong point.@MarkSZaidEsq@JesselynRadack - 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq Sterling's attnys don't agree with you. Did you bother to interview them?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@emptywheel@MarkSZaidEsq@JesselynRadack Damning according to who? That's the question. Any indication the jury viewed it that way? -
@emptywheel@MarkSZaidEsq@JesselynRadack They certainly might have but wouldn't that have been worthy of an inquiry?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.