@MarkSZaidEsq "Most damning evidence"=#CIA was warned by #Sterling lawyers (you & RK) that he *might* #leak to #presshttp://www.salon.com/2015/01/28/this_is_how_a_police_state_protects_secrets_jeffrey_sterling_the_cia_and_up_to_80_years_on_circumstantial_evidence/ …
-
-
Replying to @JesselynRadack
@JesselynRadack Ah yes, a reputable unbiased source in Wheeler to continue your defamatory personal vendatta. Keep spinning.@BradMossEsq3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@MarkSZaidEsq Did you even read the article? You seem not to, especialy not the caveats.@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq2 replies 3 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq I read your article. To say "most damning" is false and nothing but a clear personal attack.4 replies 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@MarkSZaidEsq And something that DELIBERATELY doesn't name you is a personal attack?@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq1 reply 5 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq So I should thank you instead?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@MarkSZaidEsq Here's some basic reality. 1) Obviously that's not good evidence, bc otherwise you'd be on stand@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq You're so not a lawyer, and you have no idea of the facts behind the scenes. So typical.2 replies 2 retweets 1 like
@MarkSZaidEsq And you are so repeating that over and over, but not explaining what the facts behind scene are. @JesselynRadack @BradMossEsq
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq It's not my scene. I didn't create it. So I have nothing to explain0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.