@MarkSZaidEsq "Most damning evidence"=#CIA was warned by #Sterling lawyers (you & RK) that he *might* #leak to #presshttp://www.salon.com/2015/01/28/this_is_how_a_police_state_protects_secrets_jeffrey_sterling_the_cia_and_up_to_80_years_on_circumstantial_evidence/ …
-
-
Replying to @JesselynRadack
@JesselynRadack Ah yes, a reputable unbiased source in Wheeler to continue your defamatory personal vendatta. Keep spinning.@BradMossEsq3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@MarkSZaidEsq Did you even read the article? You seem not to, especialy not the caveats.@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq2 replies 3 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq I read your article. To say "most damning" is false and nothing but a clear personal attack.4 replies 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@MarkSZaidEsq And something that DELIBERATELY doesn't name you is a personal attack?@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq1 reply 5 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@JesselynRadack@BradMossEsq So I should thank you instead?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@MarkSZaidEsq 2) Hunt got it in, so fact that it was NOT entered as case in chief doesn't help. @JesselynRadack @BradMossEsq
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.