@4tis Point is it's not working. It's not doing what has been promised. Until we fix the reasons why, making it bigger is height of insanity
@4tis Sorry. Your position is? It's your turn to answer my q, before you invent more caricatures out of thin air.
-
-
@emptywheel if you accept that any system will fail to catch 100% of attacks then we shouldn't be surprised that events like this happen. -
@4tis So maybe you should just apologize for mischaracterizing my views and go on your little way? -
@emptywheel Where did I mischaracterise your views? -
@4tis Entire response has been premised on me being knee jerk bc I think SIGINT should prevent 100% of attacks, which I didn't say -
@emptywheel 2) do you think the dragnet is or isn't pointless, given that it failed to stop these attacks? You never clarified. -
@4tis I raised several reasons why dragnet may not be working, all based on evidence: too much hay, inattention, bad algos. -
@emptywheel All of those things are challenges, but what would you define as "working"? 100% success? 50% success?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel But my previous tweet wasn't an attempt to caricature your position. -
@4tis Surprise! It succeeded in doing just that!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel My position is that it is unrealistic to think that you can prevent all attacks by determined terrorists.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.