The more I read the Senate torture report, the more it seems obvious its purpose is to excuse Feinstein's guilt in the program
-
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel it's headline features are more about how the CIA evaded her committee rather than anything new about the torture2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ErrataRob
@emptywheel however much they tried to hide things, Feinstein still knew from the beginning that waterboarding was going on2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ErrataRob
@ErrataRob Got a single shred of evidence to support that? Teeny tiny? I don't like DiFi, but you're working a time machine.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Jose Rodriguez's op ed, while biased, is at least a teeny tiny shred of evidence http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/todays-cia-critics-once-urged-the-agency-to-do-anything-to-fight-al-qaeda/2014/12/05/ac418da2-7bda-11e4-84d4-7c896b90abdc_story.html …5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ErrataRob
@ErrataRob Moreover, EVEN THE CIA doesn't claim Feinstein was briefed unti l9/6/2006. They have no record of Rockefeller being.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I guess I have more reading to do. Though, it still seems terribly one-sided.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ErrataRob
@ErrataRob LOL. Again, this is based off the CIA's own docs. Not FBI. Not DOJ. Not SSCI. Not Pelosi. CIA's records say they did this.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel One side of the CIA's own records. It's not as if we get to see all of them.4 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@ErrataRob Here's me noting Rodriguez altering records back in 2002.
https://www.emptywheel.net/2010/06/13/they-changed-the-pelosi-briefing-description-after-deciding-to-destroy-torture-tapes/ …
Now know he took out ref to illegality.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.