@emptywheel What's a DTS in that citation?
-
-
-
@fordm Not sure. May be kind of Bates stamp for the SSCI docs that weren't CIA.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel I personally want to know why the portion markings themselves are redacted. (Between top secret and noforn) -
@ThunderJew1775 Which is funny bc when torture started it wasn't compartmented. It took a while. -
@emptywheel isn't the whole point that the portion marking &product number are unclassified but signify the content's classification?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel Well spotted. AFM perhaps. Or mention of loophole in EO that cld permit EITs. -
@RupertStone83 Thinking it might be HIG, but not sure. -
@emptywheel Yes, makes sense. Any hint of what they actually do likely to be blacked out.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel No torture for regular terrorism, but still needed to find the dinosaur chronospiesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wasn't implied point of GITMO's Penny Lane promises?
@emptywheel Still active,@JasonLeopold ?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@emptywheel the answer to that question is also classified.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.