New @OTI/@GPPi study on tech sovereignty proposals concludes a more encrypted net is better than a more bordered one: http://newamerica.org/oti/technological-sovereignty-press-release/ …
-
-
Replying to @KevinBankston
@KevinBankston Did you see@MiekeEoyang's proposal on FAA?http://www.lawfareblog.com/2014/11/a-modest-proposal-faa-exclusivity-for-collection-involving-u-s-technology-companies/ …3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@MiekeEoyang ...but could still see some hesitance from US companies re regime that explicitly allows US process for non-US data1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KevinBankston
@KevinBankston@emptywheel We're talking about moving that kind of data from 12333 to 702, from POTUS discretion to statutory basis.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
@MiekeEoyang@emptywheel Which I'm a fan of--see my Q to Litt at G-town 12333 event suggesting 12333 collection go under 702-like structure1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KevinBankston
@KevinBankston@emptywheel thanks. But not all 12333 collection could go under it. You need a USP hook.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@MiekeEoyang But there is still issue both Feinstein & Udall raised, "troves" of USP data that should be treated under FISA @KevinBankston
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.