New @OTI/@GPPi study on tech sovereignty proposals concludes a more encrypted net is better than a more bordered one: http://newamerica.org/oti/technological-sovereignty-press-release/ …
-
-
Replying to @KevinBankston
@KevinBankston Did you see@MiekeEoyang's proposal on FAA?http://www.lawfareblog.com/2014/11/a-modest-proposal-faa-exclusivity-for-collection-involving-u-s-technology-companies/ …3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@MiekeEoyang ...but could still see some hesitance from US companies re regime that explicitly allows US process for non-US data1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KevinBankston
@KevinBankston@emptywheel We're talking about moving that kind of data from 12333 to 702, from POTUS discretion to statutory basis.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
@MiekeEoyang I think@KevinBankston and I are talking Title III. The warrant for Irish content in NY thing.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@MiekeEoyang (Just to be clear, that's not a Title III wiretap case, it's a Rule 41/SCA warrant case)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@KevinBankston Thanks. I stand corrected. @MiekeEoyang
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.