New @OTI/@GPPi study on tech sovereignty proposals concludes a more encrypted net is better than a more bordered one: http://newamerica.org/oti/technological-sovereignty-press-release/ …
-
-
@emptywheel@MiekeEoyang Yes--a neat idea, though need to iron out some issues around local domestic process for extraterritorial data...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@emptywheel@MiekeEoyang ...which has been big issue lately see e.g. MSFT case in SDNY re data in Dublin. That's a Rule 41-specific issue... -
@KevinBankston Yeah, I already raised the MSFT case. https://www.emptywheel.net/2014/11/24/a-radical-proposal-of-following-the-law/ …@MiekeEoyang -
@emptywheel@KevinBankston This is data that's not used in a Title 18 context, but in a Title 50 context, for the most part.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel@MiekeEoyang ...but could still see some hesitance from US companies re regime that explicitly allows US process for non-US data -
@KevinBankston@emptywheel We're talking about moving that kind of data from 12333 to 702, from POTUS discretion to statutory basis. -
@MiekeEoyang@emptywheel Which I'm a fan of--see my Q to Litt at G-town 12333 event suggesting 12333 collection go under 702-like structure -
@KevinBankston@emptywheel thanks. But not all 12333 collection could go under it. You need a USP hook. -
@MiekeEoyang But there is still issue both Feinstein & Udall raised, "troves" of USP data that should be treated under FISA@KevinBankston
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.