@charlie_savage good note. @benjaminwittes, what do you think?
-
-
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
@charlie_savage I don't think anyone reading@MiekeEoyang's proposal would think "modest" was in the Swiftian sense.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benjaminwittes
@benjaminwittes@charlie_savage@MiekeEoyang Think it's very modest. Skeptical it eliminate justifiably adversarial response fr cos hacked?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel We gotta start somewhere.@benjaminwittes@charlie_savage6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
@MiekeEoyang Also important Q of how criminal warrants on servers in Ireland are treated.@benjaminwittes@charlie_savage1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel In some ways that's a question of the companies' assertions of americanness.@benjaminwittes@charlie_savage1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
@MiekeEoyang How so? Is that a legally accepted intl law definition (esp w/google hack considered)?@benjaminwittes@charlie_savage2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel If companies assert that servers outside the US are foreign, then access is on foreign entity.@benjaminwittes@charlie_savage1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
@MiekeEoyang Right, but DOJ disagrees. Which is why I think 2 examples linked.@benjaminwittes@charlie_savage1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Agreed, its an issue. Which is why i need to do more analysis on the foreignness.@benjaminwittes@charlie_savage1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@MiekeEoyang Which also gets into their viability as intl corporations. They CAN'T abide by DOJ's argument @benjaminwittes @charlie_savage
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.