This is a very interesting, disruptive idea: Kudos to @MiekeEoyang for coming up with it. http://www.lawfareblog.com/?p=41269 1/2
-
-
Replying to @benjaminwittes
.
@MiekeEoyang I honestly don’t know whether civil liberties folks will love or hate it or whether IC folks will love or hate it.#virtue 2/21 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @benjaminwittes
@benjaminwittes we're a centrist think tank, so used to the middle. FAA exclusivity offers something but not everything to everyone.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
Why call it a 'modest proposal?' It appears to me that you are serious, but that connotes satire.
@MiekeEoyang@benjaminwittes2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @charlie_savage
@charlie_savage because it is modest. It doesn't solve everything.@benjaminwittes1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
@MiekeEoyang Suggest rehedding "A Small Proposal" or "A Modest Idea" unless this is satire bc http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Modest_Proposal …@benjaminwittes1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @charlie_savage
@charlie_savage good note.@benjaminwittes, what do you think?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
@charlie_savage I don't think anyone reading@MiekeEoyang's proposal would think "modest" was in the Swiftian sense.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benjaminwittes
@benjaminwittes@charlie_savage@MiekeEoyang Think it's very modest. Skeptical it eliminate justifiably adversarial response fr cos hacked?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel We gotta start somewhere.@benjaminwittes@charlie_savage6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@MiekeEoyang And bc of that, this will be more a technological battle than a legal one. @benjaminwittes @charlie_savage
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.