What?!?! "They cannot cite a single example of this program being abused,” Rubio said of the bill’s supporters. http://www.politico.com/story/2014/11/mitch-mcconnell-rand-paul-nsa-bill-112984.html#ixzz3JTeMYODH …
-
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I'm pretty sure you're joking, but LOVEINT was intentional.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alvarombedoya
@alvarombedoya No. I'm not. Politico has a bad quote. LOVEINT is content. And reform supporter should know 215 abuses better.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Wait a second, doesn't the page 1 of Grassley LOVEINT letter refer to an illegal *metadata* search? http://www.scribd.com/mobile/doc/171424593 …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alvarombedoya
@alvarombedoya Mentioning USSID 18, not 215. Remember 215 is a small fraction of the metadata dragnet.2 replies 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel you just said that LOVEINT was content. You were wrong. LOVEINT was not all content. I'm sorry, but when you're wrong, admit it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alvarombedoya
@alvarombedoya Yes. I'm wrong. But does it say it was 215? No. So we're both wrong.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
@alvarombedoya But there are far more eye-popping abuses under 215 our side has been utterly silent about.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.