@Thomas_Drake1 The warrantless programs you are referencing did not rely upon FISA.
-
-
Replying to @BradMossEsq
.
@BradMossEsq I didn't list them. B4 FISA certain programs violated 4A. Post 9/11 domestic/USP programs (several) violated 4A/FISA/statutes.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @Thomas_Drake1
@Thomas_Drake1 The post-9/11, pre-PAA/FAA programs were likely unconstitutional. I didn't say otherwise.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@Thomas_Drake1 They circumvented FISA, which was specifically created to reform the process1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@Thomas_Drake1 The programs currently being modified did not, however, circumvent FISA4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq What do you mean by "circumvent FISA"? Upstream still does. Prolly evidence reverse targeting does.@Thomas_Drake11 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@Thomas_Drake1 Except for that whole part where Sec 702 certs go through the FISC. And are overseen by the FISC.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq You appear to be unfamiliar w/2010 and 2011 Bates decisions. A good place for you to start.@Thomas_Drake11 reply 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@Thomas_Drake1 Yes, as you know, I am supremely stupid. I completely forgot those opinions. Not.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@emptywheel@Thomas_Drake1 Did you forget the November 2011 opinion where he approved the corrections made to the deficiencies?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@BradMossEsq I actually don't have time re-explaining basic record you pretend doesn't exist. Thanks tho. @Thomas_Drake1
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@Thomas_Drake1 I didn't ask for you to join the conversation Marcy. Have a nice day. Glad you are determining what is "legal"1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq@emptywheel@Thomas_Drake1 FISC only hears govts side & agrees 95+% /time 2suggest FISC will reign in or uphold const is crazy0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.