.@BradMossEsq actually not, but don't let my years of w'blowing (or Diane Roark's) on post 9/11 violations 4A/FISA get in way of ur analysis
-
-
Replying to @Thomas_Drake1
@Thomas_Drake1 The warrantless programs you are referencing did not rely upon FISA.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
.
@BradMossEsq I didn't list them. B4 FISA certain programs violated 4A. Post 9/11 domestic/USP programs (several) violated 4A/FISA/statutes.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @Thomas_Drake1
@Thomas_Drake1 The post-9/11, pre-PAA/FAA programs were likely unconstitutional. I didn't say otherwise.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@Thomas_Drake1 They circumvented FISA, which was specifically created to reform the process1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@Thomas_Drake1 The programs currently being modified did not, however, circumvent FISA4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq What do you mean by "circumvent FISA"? Upstream still does. Prolly evidence reverse targeting does.@Thomas_Drake11 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@Thomas_Drake1 Except for that whole part where Sec 702 certs go through the FISC. And are overseen by the FISC.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq Does that change that NSA is illegally collecting USP content in US?@Thomas_Drake11 reply 3 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@Thomas_Drake1 That's a vague allegation. Are we still talking Sec 702?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@BradMossEsq Not vague in the least. NSA collecting 46,000 comms fr USPs in US a year. Acc to Bates it is NOT incidental. @Thomas_Drake1
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.