Joel, as he ducks Q of how many USPs' phone records collected, I don't want to duck it. 1) Technical ability 2) Can put at risk collection
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Meaning, if they told us how many USPs, it would tell us which telcos they're collecting from? What about 702/EO12333?4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PatrickCToomey
@PatrickCToomey W/idea that if we track how many records we get fr, say, MSFT, we'll figure out they've got Skype.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Maybe true if they count by company, but not by authority or program. Already gave numbers like that to Bates in 2011.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PatrickCToomey
@PatrickCToomey They gave UPSs for MCTs, but not for SCTs.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Right, b/c that's what Bates cared about and ordered them to estimate. I don't think there are different technical obstacles.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@PatrickCToomey He did tell them to count the SCTs. They didn't.
And then he Bates-stamped their expanded surveillance.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.