@emptywheel What exactly is it that you're upset about? I don't understand.
-
-
Replying to @catlin201
@catlin201 Again, I can only go on available evidence bc FBI hides own internal rules. But evidence say they're doing dubious things.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I guess I'd say it's possible there's more to this story then what the FBI has released. The problem is you make this huge leap.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @catlin201
@emptywheel I don't see any reason to believe the FBI knowingly hacked a US Person without a warrant.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @catlin201
@catlin201 There is malware release they clearly do--in multiple situations. And then there are ways to ID locations.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Your original question was, basically, would I approve of aggressive tactics against Wall Street. The answer is yes, I would.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @catlin201
@emptywheel So there's no double standard. I'm not sure what all this other stuff means.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @catlin201
@catlin201 "I'm not sure what all this other stuff means." That is becoming clear. We were talking 3 events. You're unaware of 2.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Im not sure what the relevance of this stuff is to the fact that I dont have a double standard. I support investigating Wall St.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @catlin201
@emptywheel Your original tweet I responded to said that there's a double standard for investigations on Wall St. vs Drug Dealers.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@catlin201 Actually, I wasn't referring to drug dealers, but in any case, the approach would never NOR SHOULD be used against banks bc 4th A
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.