@speechboy71 Sure - but most of them have been either (a) “reports of domestic problems have been grossly exaggerated” ...
-
-
Replying to @henryfarrell
@speechboy71 which I don’t buy, given e.g. report by Sunstein etc, but which is anyway immaterial to the case I’m making. ...6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @henryfarrell
@speechboy71 or (b) “mass surveillance of the populations of our allies is just fine and dandy,” which is problematic for reasons I describe2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @henryfarrell
@henryfarrell The three you picked are far from knowledgable about the issue. And Kinsley isn't much of a natl sec thinker3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @speechboy71
@speechboy71 Seriously, it is not a sound intellectual argument to say, "Keith Alexander said this so it must be true."@henryfarrell1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Ok I'm just going to block you if you continue to be so rude.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @speechboy71
@speechboy71 OK. You've done lots of independent reading of the primary documents?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I have actually. I just think you and I view them differently3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @speechboy71
@speechboy71 What are the ways back door searches get used?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
@speechboy71 Those questions are all ones you would need to be able to answer to make claims you made in C4 review. Surely you know answers.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.