@speechboy71 Subtweeting to snark in the most passive aggressive fashion possible ... I guess that works.
-
-
Replying to @henryfarrell
@henryfarrell Ha! Fair enough. But wish you had engaged with arguments of those other than Packer, Wilentz & Kinsley4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @speechboy71
@speechboy71 Sure - but most of them have been either (a) “reports of domestic problems have been grossly exaggerated” ...3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @henryfarrell
@speechboy71 which I don’t buy, given e.g. report by Sunstein etc, but which is anyway immaterial to the case I’m making. ...6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @henryfarrell
@speechboy71 or (b) “mass surveillance of the populations of our allies is just fine and dandy,” which is problematic for reasons I describe2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @henryfarrell
@henryfarrell The three you picked are far from knowledgable about the issue. And Kinsley isn't much of a natl sec thinker3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @speechboy71
@speechboy71 Seriously, it is not a sound intellectual argument to say, "Keith Alexander said this so it must be true."@henryfarrell1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Ok I'm just going to block you if you continue to be so rude.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @speechboy71
@speechboy71 OK. You've done lots of independent reading of the primary documents?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I have actually. I just think you and I view them differently3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@speechboy71 How big was 215 watchlist compared to Minaret watchlist?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.