Using Wilentz, Packer & Kinsley to dismiss all liberal criticism of Snowden … I guess that works:http://nationalinterest.org/feature/big-brother%E2%80%99s-liberal-friends-11515?page=show …
-
-
Replying to @speechboy71
@speechboy71 Subtweeting to snark in the most passive aggressive fashion possible ... I guess that works.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @henryfarrell
@henryfarrell Ha! Fair enough. But wish you had engaged with arguments of those other than Packer, Wilentz & Kinsley4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @speechboy71
@speechboy71 Sure - but most of them have been either (a) “reports of domestic problems have been grossly exaggerated” ...3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @henryfarrell
@speechboy71 which I don’t buy, given e.g. report by Sunstein etc, but which is anyway immaterial to the case I’m making. ...6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @henryfarrell
@speechboy71 or (b) “mass surveillance of the populations of our allies is just fine and dandy,” which is problematic for reasons I describe2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @henryfarrell
@henryfarrell The three you picked are far from knowledgable about the issue. And Kinsley isn't much of a natl sec thinker3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@speechboy71 We're still discovering ways it has affected USPs, still discovering ways govt has abused FISC process. @henryfarrell
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.