@emptywheel @BernardKingIII Yeah, not so sure I buy that at all. Might have changed the court's basis, but not necessarily the final result.
@BernardKingIII I think she might have ruled for Ulbricht if he had submitted a dec saying he had expectation. @bmaz
-
-
-
@bmaz She gave Ulbricht abt 100 opportunities to say that was his server.@BernardKingIII -
@emptywheel@BernardKingIII Sure. And he would have been an idiot to have taken any of them. Not a novel conundrum in 4th Amend law. -
@bmaz But I imagine it'll go somewhere else on appeal.@BernardKingIII
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel@BernardKingIII Now maybe I am just not sophisticated enough to understand, but I fail to see how any of that exculpates Ulbrict -
@bmaz Not a matter of exculpating him. A matter of proving investigation was conducted illegally.@BernardKingIII
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel@BernardKingIII And that, it seems to me is why he couldn't sign the dec. If signs the dec, he owns the lot of it definitively.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.