@emptywheel But how does anyone justify violating the privacy of the children? THINK OF THE CHILDREN, DEA!
-
-
-
@PogoWasRight@emptywheel Since it seas targeted to criminals by design, why isn't involving+exposing the children child endangerment? -
@bmaz@emptywheel Endangerment and invasion of privacy. If the facts are as described, I don't see how this is lawful conduct. -
@PogoWasRight@emptywheel Exactly right. Frankly, I am not even positive I agree the §1030(f) law enforcement "exception" to CFAA applies. -
@bmaz Bet you a quarter they followed internal rules on approving narcs, and therefore think it doesn't matter.@PogoWasRight -
@emptywheel@PogoWasRight Maybe! DEA case agents have a LOT more autonomy than FBI, this one may have just hatched this up and done it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel They said there's no exemption for law enforcement, so presumably not.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.