@emptywheel BTW, don't know for sure if you agree, but strongly guessing you might: http://www.bradblog.com/?p=10847
-
-
Replying to @TheBradBlog
@TheBradBlog You left out what should be Verrilli's biggest diqualifier. He lied to SCOTUS, and refuses to correct that lie.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @TheBradBlog
@TheBradBlog That govt gave notice to defendants under 702, in Amnesty v. Clapper. https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140514/06214727229/doj-still-trying-to-hide-fact-it-flat-out-lied-to-supreme-court-about-domestic-surveillance.shtml …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Cld forgive original "lie" if he didn't know abt it (seems plausible). But later justification letter is pretty horrible.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TheBradBlog
@TheBradBlog Agree he didn't know, just as Paul Clement didn't know we torture when he didn't tell SCOTUS. But failure to correct is big.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel What wld be correct process in such a case? Admit error and seek new hearing before SCOTUS?! How wld that even happen??2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@TheBradBlog Just noticing it should make a difference in ACLU v. Amnesty, which will be on its way up fr same 2nd C judges next year.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.