Liza Goitein in @just_security on why USA Freedom is the #privacy law we need, even if it's not the law we deserve. http://justsecurity.org/15839/its-time-pass-usa-freedom-act-warts/ …
-
-
Replying to @RachelBLevinson
@RachelBLevinson@just_security Color me unconvinced. It is a wolf in sheeps clothing that will ingrain legally worst of dragnet. Bleech.2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @bmaz
@bmaz Tho she is patently wrong when she says it offers transparency for most FISA programs.@RachelBLevinson@just_security3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@RachelBLevinson@just_security Agree. But at the root "yes or no" question, think USAF is a no. Better to build toward better.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bmaz
@bmaz But Gotein appears to patently misunderstand what transparency provisions actually do.@RachelBLevinson3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@RachelBLevinson I think well meaning civil libertarians are so battered, theyre willing to accept a pat on the head as progress2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bmaz
@bmaz@emptywheel I think that's a little unfair. I think there's a decent consensus that this represents progress, even if not everything.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RachelBLevinson
@RachelBLevinson There's a decent consensus by people who are patently misrepresenting the bill.@bmaz1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@bmaz Again, I'd say that's a little unfair, especially since it implies willful misrepresentation (by our side).5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@RachelBLevinson I know when I've pointed to the ACTUAL language of bill, no one rebuts my claims. So... @bmaz
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.