@HelpSnowden @gregorylent No, I don't. If he wanted the info out he could have revealed it himself with immunity
-
-
-
Replying to @HelpSnowden
@HelpSnowden@gregorylent No, I'm saying he could have revealed these classified programs himself if he thought it so important1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq@gregorylent If you were in Wydens shoes, you would not have asked the question?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HelpSnowden
@HelpSnowden@gregorylent depends on whether point of question was to embarrass clapper or to actually reveal the programs2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq@gregorylent Maybe suspicion that IC or Clapper not being truthful and wanted it on public record?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HelpSnowden
@HelpSnowden@gregorylent That wasn't an answer. Wanted what exactly on public record?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq@gregorylent his assertion Americans are not being surveilled1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HelpSnowden
@HelpSnowden@gregorylent "Wittingly" -- If I recall he was referring to Section 702 surveillance4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq@HelpSnowden@gregorylent The context, recall, was DIRNSA publicly denying NSA kept "dossiers" on "millions of Americans"2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@normative Right. Anyone who discusses this and doesn't discuss Alexander at DefCon looks ridiculous @BradMossEsq @HelpSnowden @gregorylent
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.