@BradMossEsq It's not abt word games. It's abt hiding surveillance. You support that! But owe it to yourself to test claims @Thomas_Drake1
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@Thomas_Drake1 I support constitutional surveillance. You and I just don't agree on what that encompasses.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq That's not what we're talking abt. We're talking abt what real surveillance is.1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel You said I support surveillance; I was clarifying your remark2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq Oh I meant you support govt obscuring what they're really doing. That gives you obligation to test their claims like this.1 reply 2 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I don't know where I ever said I support obscuring surveillance but OK.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq It's part of secrecy: govt ability to get surveillance w/o explaining why, which is what seems to be going on here.1 reply 4 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Explaining it to oversight bodies or to public?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq What's going on here is making overblown claims to public. But trust me, oversight doesn't get a lot of this.1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Because oversight doesn't ask or agencies lie? The former is oversight's fault; the latter is inexcusable.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@BradMossEsq It's a lot easier for oversight to say, "Hey, they say they need all phone records" then to say,...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.