@Thomas_Drake1 @gregpmiller That's not what this piece was about
-
-
Replying to @BradMossEsq
.
@bradmossesq@gregpmiller Making it easier & more convenient for LE? Under that logic I shud give my car & house keys to FBI just in case?1 reply 7 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @Thomas_Drake1
@Thomas_Drake1@gregpmiller Again, not what piece said. Was identifying problem w/r/t blocking lawful warrants3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
.
@bradmossesq@gregpmiller Didn't say lawful. Said valid. Comey said these phones allow ppl to place themselves above the law. So which law?2 replies 5 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @Thomas_Drake1
@Thomas_Drake1@gregpmiller You know by "valid search warrant" he meant a lawfully issued one. That's what 4th Amendment requires1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@bradmossesq@gregpmiller Words matter. 4A requires prob cause affidavit-based warrant issuance only. Gov't conduct created causal backlash.1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @Thomas_Drake1
@Thomas_Drake1@gregpmiller Any basis for concluding that's not what Comey was referring to?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
.
@bradmossesq@gregpmiller DoJ b4 SCOTUS in April. FBI wants access thru 3rd Party. Encryption=obstruction of justice: makes phonecos liable1 reply 7 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @Thomas_Drake1
@Thomas_Drake1@gregpmiller And your thought on why that's not the focus of this piece?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
.
@bradmossesq@gregpmiller Comey really flagging he wants 3rd party back door access. Do you know history of Clipper chip? Gov't argued same7 replies 4 retweets 8 likes
@Thomas_Drake1 Also, I suspect, ready warrantless access at borders. @bradmossesq @gregpmiller
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.