Well… of course 12333 also APPLIES within the US, but so do statutes which have more stringent restrictions.
-
-
Replying to @normative
@normative There's a weird bit since 2008 EO 12333 where that's not always true. Prolly represents something Yoo introduced but didn't write1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Well, there may be methods of surveillance that slip between the statutory definitions...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @normative
@normative Saying there are corners of FISA that are different and arguably more lenient than EO 12333.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Hm. Hard pressed to think of what that could be where FISA actually applies..1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@normative In 2008 they replaced complying w/both 12333 and FISA to just FISA.
http://www.emptywheel.net/2014/02/28/2008s-new-and-improved-eo-12333-sharing-sigint/ …
There may be corners.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.