If this is what the law says, then the law needs to be changed http://www.fiercegovernmentit.com/story/nsa-chief-dismisses-scandals-impact-says-agency-fully-compliant-law/2014-09-17?utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal …
-
-
Replying to @astepanovich
@astepanovich Instead there's a big rush to pass "transparency provisions" that hide the parts of the law they're not compliant with.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel They're already hiding those parts, no?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @astepanovich
@astepanovich Yes. But those transparency measures will hide ONLY the illegal bits. Makes it hard to mobilize around it1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Of course. Def something I believe we need to keep pushing on, but not really a step backward from where we are3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @astepanovich
@astepanovich I can go on. But the "transparency" in this bill, BY DESIGN, allows Senators to claim they did something they will not have.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I think they should have to report all of it. But a step more transparency is valuable, and a continued fight for full reporting1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@astepanovich I believed that until I saw how perfectly they had exempted all the most illegal and/or controversial programs.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@astepanovich Yeah, there is a reason the Admin is good with this.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.