@emptywheel i guess it's a Title 10 army nt a proxy army
-
-
Replying to @chinahand
@chinahand Isn't that what the fight is about? Moving it under Title 10?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel had troubling parsing the take on the CIA. If arming rebels FUBAR, logic is to shut it down, not fight w/ DoD for chance to run2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chinahand
@emptywheel expanded program. Unless it's "We know how to f*ck this up on small, covert scale, so we're ready to take it to the next level"2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chinahand
@chinahand Maybe it's "No, ISIS was just designed to get you worried to really start resourcing our Assad fight"?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I lean toward the idea that Gulf states pumped IS as alternative to US Syria policy they found insufficiently aggressive1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chinahand
@chinahand Right. And some of those happen to be very close to the CIA.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Maybe we'll see some dramatic JAN anvil in south/IS hammer in north action against Assad and few anti-IS airstrikes (or even1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chinahand
@emptywheel anti-Assad airstrikes) in support of a regime-change roll of the dice that CIA/KSA would prefer.#ThisTimeWeveReallyGotHim1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chinahand
@emptywheel Then if everything turns to sh*t (as KSA/CIA plans often do), then O switches to longer-term, more conservative Title 10 force2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@chinahand I'm assuming Brennan doesn't have a biographer he's fucking but if he does I assume that'll break soon.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.