@Futuristprophet @emptywheel Her claim of intent, obviously. The fact that they got U.S. weapons and weapons given to rebels is different.
@MichaelKelleyBI We gave teh arms to "moderate" rebels willing to sell US journos to ISIS. @Futuristprophet
-
-
@emptywheel That's been disputed but OK http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/isis-terror/white-house-denies-steven-sotloff-was-sold-isis-moderates-n199541 … That still doesn't mean that U.S. had intention of indirectly arming ISIS -
@MichaelKelleyBI Oh no. We just let Bandar have our money and do whatever he wanted with it, no strings attached. Again. -
@emptywheel Now you are intellectually flailing. The snark implies that you actually stand by original statement, which is wild. -
@MichaelKelleyBI The snark was designed to suggest the US has a very long history of working w/Bandar on this stuff, know what he does.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You are chaining enough 'indirects' together to be clearly reaching.
@emptywheel@MichaelKelleyBI@FuturistprophetThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.