@charlie_savage Um. I believe even you reported they moved that overseas. Which means Congress can't bar anymore.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Congress has not chosen to regulate overseas-based data collection. That doesn't mean it can't.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @charlie_savage
@charlie_savage Yes. And that legal fight to SCOTUS would keep you in business writing for about a decade.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel In any case purely domestic calling data, which is what we're talking about, isn't systematically available overseas3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @charlie_savage
@charlie_savage Point is they are making that claim to get Congress to make same bet FISC did in 2004/6: dragnet w/oversight rather than not2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel If FISA is unconstitutional, does that mean all the FISC opinions are unconstitutional too?@charlie_savage@JameelJaffer2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @PatrickCToomey
@PatrickCToomey Do you have a venue in which to argue FISA is unconstitutional? Have at it, please!@charlie_savage@JameelJaffer4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@PatrickCToomey@JameelJaffer Criminal defendants have challenged FISA constitutionality in the context of suppression but lost1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @charlie_savage
@charlie_savage And now defendants who'd PROBABLY have a great challenge to 702 not given notice/standing.@PatrickCToomey@JameelJaffer1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@PatrickCToomey@JameelJaffer That is immaterial to this conversational point.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@charlie_savage My point that govt can thru own action prevent any new review. @PatrickCToomey @JameelJaffer
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.