@charlie_savage Um. I believe even you reported they moved that overseas. Which means Congress can't bar anymore.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Congress has not chosen to regulate overseas-based data collection. That doesn't mean it can't.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @charlie_savage
@charlie_savage Yes. And that legal fight to SCOTUS would keep you in business writing for about a decade.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel In any case purely domestic calling data, which is what we're talking about, isn't systematically available overseas3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @charlie_savage
@charlie_savage Point is they are making that claim to get Congress to make same bet FISC did in 2004/6: dragnet w/oversight rather than not2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel If FISA is unconstitutional, does that mean all the FISC opinions are unconstitutional too?@charlie_savage@JameelJaffer2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @PatrickCToomey
@PatrickCToomey Do you have a venue in which to argue FISA is unconstitutional? Have at it, please!@charlie_savage@JameelJaffer4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel It's the government's argument, yet it constantly points to FISA/FISC to say programs are legal.@charlie_savage@JameelJaffer3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PatrickCToomey
@PatrickCToomey It also points to Congressional ratification. & 2C first court that has really doubted claim@charlie_savage@JameelJaffer1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Idea is that gov't can't have it both ways on FISA—call it unconstitutional, but also say that it makes programs legal.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@PatrickCToomey Why not? You expect consistency? The courts don't.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.