Again, Jack Goldsmith's memo did 3 simple things: say content collection OK under AUMF, say BOTH phone & internet dragnet OK under Smith.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I think he said metadata collection didn't raise 4th Amendment issues under Smith. Ergo his objection was statutory.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @charlie_savage
@charlie_savage Not to mention we know--bc public record says--there were other problems. It was NOT just Internet, if it was even internet.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I agree there were additional complexities in the mix - the Iraq thing etc.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @charlie_savage
@charlie_savage Memo also said "i don't GAF how you implement this." as people said for at least 5 years afterwards.
6:54 PM - 6 Sep 2014
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.