@byersalex Remember USAF will mean MORE people get swept up under 2-degrees theory. A win for IC! @JakeLaperruque @granick
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@byersalex@granick Current law lets NSA get everyone in America in a single order; strongly believe we're improving from that4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JakeLaperruque
@JakeLaperruque But not analyze them. Ledgett has said they'll expose more USPs to analysis under new program.@byersalex@granick1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@byersalex@granick Nothing in §215 restricts analysis of bulk store, just internal rules that can be changed4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JakeLaperruque
@JakeLaperruque Also note, USAF changes retention from CT to FI purpose for CDR--another expansion.@byersalex@granick1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@byersalex@granick that was House bill; new Senate version fixed this problem2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JakeLaperruque
@JakeLaperruque Basically it gives the IC what they took by violation until 2009. Nifty!@byersalex@granick1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@jakelaperruque@byersalex Current 215 law requires relevance. Current practice violates that requirement. 2d Cir may crack down3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @granick
@granick Then again, Marty's arg 2nd C may wait bc of USAF/PATRIOT reauth makes sense.@jakelaperruque@byersalex1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@jakelaperruque@byersalex It would be a mistake to wait. People need to know what "relevance" means.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@granick Agree. But I'm also not a 2nd C judge smarting from my last reversal w/same crowd related topic. @jakelaperruque @byersalex
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.