@emptywheel @Krhawkins5 if there was a staffer-driven effort to build leg history, it would come in speeches, statements from bill sponsors
@Krhawkins5 Sure. On an issue for which there was independent support. @alvarombedoya
-
-
-
@alvarombedoya Well, that's not actually what was said abt this letter. But we should ignore all that I guess.@Krhawkins5 -
@emptywheel@Krhawkins5 I hear you, it just strikes me as strange. But maybe It is just backfired effort at leg history. -
@alvarombedoya Especially since 2 of these things--advocate & transparency--involve ODNI prerogatives@Krhawkins5
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel@Krhawkins5 leg history already on tenuous ground (Scalia) I can't think of a judge seeing letter like this as good leg history -
@alvarombedoya Yup. Too bad even the 2nd Circuit decision may not make it to Scalia bc Congress is busy ratifying the program.@Krhawkins5
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel@Krhawkins5 IC letter re what it thinks bill says says nothing re what Congress thinks it saysThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@emptywheel@Krhawkins5 so I just realized another reason why this doesn't make sense as leg history. It's not *leg* history.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.