@Krhawkins5 No they ARE included in the bill. They are included, meaning Congress is RATIFYING them. While being litigated @alvarombedoya
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@Krhawkins5@alvarombedoya I'm not totally sure I think that's a tenable argument for the IC, even with this letter.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @astepanovich
@astepanovich Eagan, McLaughlin, Pauley all say Congress passing something not briefed = ratification.@Krhawkins5@alvarombedoya1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@Krhawkins5@alvarombedoya Yes, yes, of course. But we can't fail to recognize that this *is a different situation.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @astepanovich
@astepanovich It's different bc IC's ratification argument will be valid this time, unlike current claims? @Krhawkins5 @alvarombedoya
5:32 AM - 4 Sep 2014
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.