Personally, I don't think the hallmark of good or viable legislation is government opposition.
-
-
Replying to @HarleyGeiger
@harleygeiger Point is more subtle. IC says we need X for natsec. Bill seems to subtract X. IC says bill doesn't hurt natsec. Does bill - X?1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @granick
@harleygeiger After the FISC opin on 215 and 1st Am, I think transparency is job 1. No one can know what anything means if its up to FISC.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @granick
@granick Also bowing to Bates' judgment--as Clapper's letter says he will do--should be non-starter after that opinion.@harleygeiger1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@harleygeiger How much does language of any bill matter when you have judges secretly interpreting? Transparency is everything.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@granick And of course if bill passes w/current language, ODNI will say it ratifies Bates' 1A opinion. @harleygeiger
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.