@charlie_savage Illogical that when Saleh talked about who wasn't killed, he mentioned Awlaki? @ioerror
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@ioerror Yemen press release on 12/24 said he was "presumed present" along with others. That doesn't mean he was the target.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @charlie_savage
@charlie_savage Oh. Your evidence is a Yemeni press release then? OK then, I'm convinced!@jeremyscahill@ioerror3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@jeremyscahill@ioerror I'm signing off. This has become dumb.1 reply 5 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @charlie_savage
Let it be noted that
@charlie_savage signed off bc I challenged him abt credibility of Yemeni press releases.@jeremyscahill@ioerror1 reply 8 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel No, Marcy. Release shows he was rumored present; hence Saleh had reason to bring him up, which doesn't = he was target.@ioerror3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @charlie_savage
@charlie_savage Also, you're saying Dana Priest's reporting ALSO erroneous, bc she reported he was on JSOC list by January@ioerror1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@ioerror Yes, I think her reporting was erroneous. Lots about that article was erroneous.2 replies 4 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @charlie_savage
@charlie_savage So is your stance BOTH Priest and@jeremyscahill erroneous then? And absence of evidence better than evidence?@ioerror1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@jeremyscahill@ioerror First, Priest reported in that very article Awlaki wasn't the target of 12/24, so funny you're citing it3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@charlie_savage But I asked you what affirmative evidence you had that gave you reason to dismiss 5 data points... @jeremyscahill @ioerror
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.