@charlie_savage If Nasser's claim is true, then Awlaki targeted when US believed him non-operational @jeremyscahill @ioerror @hazelpress
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@jeremyscahill@ioerror@hazelpress Nasser was in no position to know anything.1 reply 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @charlie_savage
@charlie_savage Are you saying Saleh's call never happened, or Nasser didn't know why it happened?@jeremyscahill@ioerror@hazelpress1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@jeremyscahill@ioerror@hazelpress The latter. Plus gathering of dozens AQAPers, incl Wuhaysi & Shihri, means it was targetable5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @charlie_savage
@charlie_savage@emptywheel@jeremyscahill@hazelpress Could you expand on "it was targetable" for us?1 reply 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ioerror
@ioerror@emptywheel@jeremyscahill@hazelpress It means under law of war or self defense, they believed they could fire; Awlaki irrelevant2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @charlie_savage
@charlie_savage You're making arg that has nothing to do w/evidence, everything to do w/legalism.@ioerror@jeremyscahill@hazelpress1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@ioerror I haven't seen any credible reporting that says 12/24 strike was about Awlaki, and it also is illogical in context6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @charlie_savage
@charlie_savage Illogical? Based on evidence Shihri and Wuhayshi had attack in progress?@ioerror1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@ioerror Yes. It is illogical they would target a citizen without OLC memo and that he was target when Shihri and Wuhayshi there4 replies 2 retweets 0 likes
@charlie_savage So, no, you're not going to deal with the other evidence. That's fine. @jeremyscahill @ioerror
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.