@charlie_savage You're saying @JeremyScahill's reporting from Yemen is erroneous? @ioerror @hazelpress
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@jeremyscahill@ioerror@hazelpress Yes I think it is incorrect to say Awlaki was the target of that strike.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @charlie_savage
@charlie_savage My Q was whether you're claiming@jeremyscahill's report Awlaki was warned ahead of time erroneous@ioerror@hazelpress1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@jeremyscahill@ioerror@hazelpress You may be referring to his father Nasser's claim about Saleh warning him about his son?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @charlie_savage
@charlie_savage Yes. One of abt 5 datapoints that strongly suggest Awlaki targeted.@jeremyscahill@ioerror@hazelpress1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@jeremyscahill@ioerror@hazelpress No, I do not think Nasser's claim tells us anything about US targeting theory on 12/241 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @charlie_savage
@charlie_savage If Nasser's claim is true, then Awlaki targeted when US believed him non-operational@jeremyscahill@ioerror@hazelpress2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@jeremyscahill@ioerror@hazelpress Nasser was in no position to know anything.1 reply 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @charlie_savage
@charlie_savage Are you saying Saleh's call never happened, or Nasser didn't know why it happened?@jeremyscahill@ioerror@hazelpress1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@jeremyscahill@ioerror@hazelpress The latter. Plus gathering of dozens AQAPers, incl Wuhaysi & Shihri, means it was targetable5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@charlie_savage Your arg that it was "targetable" is legalistic nonsense. Has nothing to do w/evidence. @jeremyscahill @ioerror @hazelpress
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.