@MarkSZaidEsq What do I know? I wrote 40 posts that included all he said? @BradMossEsq @Paulmd199 @ashk4n
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq@Paulmd199@ashk4n I'm not talking about any specific docs, but you have no idea what info John Tye had access to.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@MarkSZaidEsq What made it into Tye's admirable op-ed is stuff that was declassed, per Clapper bc of Snowden@BradMossEsq1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq I'm sure that had a role in it, but he had access to other info. You are assuming way too much.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@MarkSZaidEsq I don't doubt he had access to more. Which, per him, he didn't try to put into op-ed, right?@BradMossEsq1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq A Lot was not put in given classification, but other refs were.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@MarkSZaidEsq OK. Then his public comments are inaccurate. But it also seems they lied to you abt what was classified.@BradMossEsq1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq What is inaccurate and who now lied?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@MarkSZaidEsq I'm not saying anyone--but@BradMossEsq suggests Clapper may not have meant it when he said he declassed bc of Snowden.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
@BradMossEsq Actually, it is. Which is why it was so insane. @MarkSZaidEsq
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@MarkSZaidEsq nope, what I said is that it was a major assumption to say it was ONLY b/c of the leaks.0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.