@BradMossEsq Not at all. But reason the info was DECLASS was bc Snowden leaked more of it. @Paulmd199 @ashk4n
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@Paulmd199@ashk4n You know that how? You've seen the NSA/State internal docs deliberating the pre-pub determination?2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq I know that everything he said has been released by govy SINCE Snowden leaks. EVERYTHING.@Paulmd199@ashk4n2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq@Paulmd199@ashk4n Completely untrue. But what do I know. I was only there on the issue during process.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@MarkSZaidEsq What do I know? I wrote 40 posts that included all he said?@BradMossEsq@Paulmd199@ashk4n5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq@Paulmd199@ashk4n I'm not talking about any specific docs, but you have no idea what info John Tye had access to.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@MarkSZaidEsq What made it into Tye's admirable op-ed is stuff that was declassed, per Clapper bc of Snowden@BradMossEsq1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq I'm sure that had a role in it, but he had access to other info. You are assuming way too much.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MarkSZaidEsq
@MarkSZaidEsq I don't doubt he had access to more. Which, per him, he didn't try to put into op-ed, right?@BradMossEsq1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq A Lot was not put in given classification, but other refs were.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@MarkSZaidEsq Again, it would be IMPOSSIBLE for me to have already written what he did if it hadn't been declassed. @BradMossEsq
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.