@BradMossEsq Not at all. But reason the info was DECLASS was bc Snowden leaked more of it. @Paulmd199 @ashk4n
@MarkSZaidEsq Don't be surprised, they lost track of what they declassed. Doesn't mean they didn't do so. @BradMossEsq
-
-
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq If they lost track of what is unclass, that means they considered info classified. Happens all the time actually -
@MarkSZaidEsq Again, my very narrow point is everything he wrote--all superb--I had written off declass court & training docs@BradMossEsq -
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq Well that's amazing then. I can't fathom why no one would have listened to you! I guess we don't need any WBers. -
@MarkSZaidEsq Some interesting people you might know actually did!@BradMossEsq -
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq So where did you write about the WH doc Tye had access to, or the info on the Pabel's Recommendation #12? Link? -
@MarkSZaidEsq Also if you're looking for my references to 12333 in President's Review Group work, don't look up "Pabel."@BradMossEsq -
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq Really, that's the best you can do is point out an obvious typo. Please by all means share your links -
@MarkSZaidEsq Links? You mean you didn't find them in basic due diligence? Gosh.@BradMossEsq - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.