@emptywheel And, FWIW, do you think that justifies the leak? No judgment, curious.
-
-
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq Justifies? That your client was able to say things he almost certainly wouldn't have before? That's your question?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel You don't know what the classification determination would have been. Or how a 1st amdt suit would have gone.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq I don't. Know only what Clapper said, which is info declassified in response to Snowden. I'm not one inventing other reality.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel "almost certainly wouldn't have been before" Sounds like "other reality" to me3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq@emptywheel it's not plausible that we'd have had all that's been declassed declassed this last year if Snowden hadn't leaked.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@konklone And, again, does that justify it? I don't want to encourage people to engage in graymail.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq You keep putting the word "justify" in people's mouth. Why? This graymail is product of your imagination.@konklone1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@konklone Marcy, I pulled you off the thread since you indicated you needed to work. Make up your mind.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@BradMossEsq Just laughing at you, using same creepy argumentative tactic again, when you already got called out for it. @konklone
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.