@BradMossEsq Not at all. But reason the info was DECLASS was bc Snowden leaked more of it. @Paulmd199 @ashk4n
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@Paulmd199@ashk4n You know that how? You've seen the NSA/State internal docs deliberating the pre-pub determination?2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq Do YOU know that? Have you actually READ what Snowden's releases have gotten released?@Paulmd199@ashk4n1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@Paulmd199@ashk4n Marcy, have you ever done pre-pub review? Ever litigated 1st amdt classification cases?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq Again, you are raising an issue I didn't make. Which simply doesn't disprove my point.@Paulmd199@ashk4n1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@Paulmd199@ashk4n It was a disingenuous point from the start. All post-hac rationalizations for the leaks.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq Again, are you accusing Clapper of LYING abt his declass? otherwise, your point is false.@Paulmd199@ashk4n1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel No, not making that claim. Which point are you saying is false?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq That Clapper released all the info your client did, saying it was so he could respond to Snowden leaks.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel That was your point, the whole justification of graymail angle.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@BradMossEsq But to invent world in which Clapper didn't declass all that info in response to Snowden is simply fanciful.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.