@electrospaces Or you could take NSA at its word they've expanded sharing. http://complex.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2013/12/17/nsa_s_top_geek_i_don_t_know_if_there_s_another_snowden … @Paulmd199 @pwnallthethings @dametzger
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Eh, why should we believe NSA at that point and not at other points?@Paulmd199@pwnallthethings@dametzger4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @electrospaces
@electrospaces There are training based distinctions (FBI too), but tech often exempted fr training@Paulmd199@pwnallthethings@dametzger1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rgslutsky
@rgslutsky Unclear, but legal docs say contractors count as NSA for court approval@electrospaces@Paulmd199@pwnallthethings@dametzger1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rgslutsky
@rgslutsky DiFi FISA Fix does explicitly, phone dragnets say anyone under NSA.@electrospaces@Paulmd199@pwnallthethings@dametzger1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @rgslutsky
@rgslutsky Also note USA Freedum gives immunity to 2 levels of contractors.@electrospaces@Paulmd199@pwnallthethings@dametzger2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@rgslutsky Assume Booz is the second one--they need someone to strip data at telecoms @electrospaces @Paulmd199 @pwnallthethings @dametzger
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.