@BradMossEsq Nobody has publicly seen the names or IDs, it is just incredibly chippy bullshit.
@BradMossEsq And yet, they apparently have no way of knowing if DB has been breached. None. @bmaz
-
-
@emptywheel@bmaz Because they're not publicly revealing it? M'kay. -
@BradMossEsq Because their own documents, repeatedly, say they don't audit these people. Again, public for a year.@bmaz -
@emptywheel@bmaz They don't audit the access, yes, I've seen your comments on that. Doesn't mean they can't tell if DB ever breached -
@BradMossEsq@emptywheel There is no evidence they can; in fact, Snowden appears to be evidence they don't know squat. -
@bmaz@emptywheel None of the three of us have seen the classified reports or been in the classified hearings. We don't know. -
@BradMossEsq@emptywheel Actually, we do know, because of Snowden. -
@bmaz@emptywheel Something that he certainly could have brought to the IG, SSCI/HPSCI, or a friendly member of congress. -
@BradMossEsq@emptywheel Oh look, you are "deflecting"! - 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel that must be a feature - not a bug.@BradMossEsq@bmazThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.