@BradMossEsq You need the list of 5 admitted targets? So you're saying you haven't followed this aspect? Zazi, Medunjanin, Ouazani, QaziX2.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel this wasn't them giving notice to Zazi? http://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/711592/zazi-court-document.pdf … and challenge http://www.denverpost.com/ci_134752362 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel You know that based on another document I presume?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq In other cases defense attys whose clients were publicly IDed as 702 catches stating they never got notice to that fact.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel And that came before or after the plea bargains?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq After. So after the point when they should have gotten notice. 702 notice to Zazi should have come at some moment as trad FISA.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Then they are able to move to vacate the plea bargains in light of that info2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq those ones the govt has admitted to (Headly, Zazi, Medunjanin), yes. Those it hasn't, no.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel The ones where the USG admitted to it, who IDed it?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@BradMossEsq Who IDed it? You mean who admitted it? Govt witnesses bragging about how great 702 is.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Sorry, typo. I meant where USG has Not admitted to it0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.