@BradMossEsq Also, as I repeat over and over and you ignore, DOJ breaking the law on notice, so how are courts going to review?
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel That's why that's being challenged in the crim proceedings re notice.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq It's being challenged where DiFi ran her mouth. How many people can't challenge it. We know of ~5 where DOJ breaking law.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Where is it being broke in crim proceeding where the D can't challenge lack of notice?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq You need the list of 5 admitted targets? So you're saying you haven't followed this aspect? Zazi, Medunjanin, Ouazani, QaziX2.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel this wasn't them giving notice to Zazi? http://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/711592/zazi-court-document.pdf … and challenge http://www.denverpost.com/ci_134752362 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel You know that based on another document I presume?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq A variety of things. in some cases the govt telling the defendant they hadn't gotten 702 notice so couldn't challenge.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel That was vague. So you know something based on non-public information from the sounds of it2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@BradMossEsq No. This is all public, I am by no means the only person noting that the govt has not fulfilled obligation to give notice.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.